Jointly leading a presentation entitled The Components of a Successful Mobile Payment System: Architecture, Partnerships and More were Liisa Kanniainen of the Mobey Forum, Brad Singer from PaymentOne and Moneet Singh of Sapphire Mobile Systems. While there was less cohesion than I would have expected in a session with the above title, each presenter made noteworthy points:
Liisa Kanniainen
· Mobile Financial Services are comprised of four distinct offerings – financial information, prepaid top up, authorization credentials and transaction processing.
· A key question yet to be answered is where security will reside on the mobile device: in an embedded chip, on secure memory or within the device’s SIM. Comment: The latter option indicates a strong GSM focus, not surprising given Mobey Forum’s member companies hail largely from Europe.
· In her view, wireless carriers are not likely to get a cut of transaction revenues generated through mobile payments. Again, this may be a Euro-centric view, as most U.S. based individuals with an interest in mobile payments that I’ve spoken to believe such monetization will be necessary to drive carrier participation.
Brad Singer
MobileOne, like Korean companies Danal and Mobilians, seeks to provide a Bill-On-Behalf-Of (BOBO) solution leveraging the wireless carriers invoice to facilitate the purchase of small ticket digital services. To be clear, this means digital goods delivered both via The Internet and to wireless devices. Key facts from his presentation:
· 18% of consumers surveyed would like to be able to charge such purchases to their wireless carriers’ invoice. In contrast, 43% surveyed would prefer to place such charges on their local phone bill.
· In the US, there is a $25 billion market for small ticket digital services (?!).
· Habbo is one example of a target merchant for this payment method. Comment: It’s interesting that iTunes, the 800 lb. gorilla amongst potential merchants in this space, received no mention.
Moneet Singh
Mr. Singh, the President and COO of Sapphire Mobile Systems, provided some much needed perspective for those who believe that contactless (NFC) payment terminals will soon become ubiquitous:
· Given in order of transaction cost (interchange + authorization fees) from highest to lowest – Card not present (as in the case of Internet purchases), Signature Credit, Signature Debit, PIN Debit. PIN Debit, which functions much like ATM withdrawals, is both the least costly and most timely.
· One might think that merchants, who have grumbled for years about the high cost of credit card transactions, would be quick to adopt PIN debit. Yet several years after the introduction of such instruments, only about 30% of merchants are equipped to accept them. Most cite the high capex associated with new POS equipment as the primary restraint.
· Improved throughput at the register alone will not compel merchants to adopt contactless payment technology. Lower transaction fees might, but only if the price for updating POS systems is attractive.
Other interesting points by Moneet Singh:
· Even absent transaction fees, Mobile payment is currently not cost neutral for consumers, who must pay for new mobile devices and/or data plans and/or SMS messages and/or incremental voice calls.
· With respect to mobile P2P funds transfers, a survey conducted by Sapphire indicates that payees are willing to pay an average of $.50 per transaction for immediacy while payers aren’t willing to pay anything. Banks enabling such a service would also prefer to charge the payee, as the payee is often a non-customer. Comment: The current parallel to this is ATM fees, which are relatively steep for non-customers and usually free to bank customers.
· Banks are often not fond of online bill pay, for which they typically bear the cost with no recovery mechanism. This will also drive banks’ hesitation to enable mobile bill pay. Comment: I don’t fully agree with the generalization, as I have spoken to bank executives who profess interest in any technology that 1) reduces the amount of paper they need to process and 2)allows them to differentiate their services.